Antoineonline.com : Postmistress, the (9780399156199) : Sarah Blake : Books
  Login | Register En  |  Fr
Antoine Online

Postmistress, The

by Sarah Blake
Our price: LBP 38,950Unavailable
*Contact us to request a special order. Price may vary.
I Add to my wishlist
|

Product Details

  • Publisher: Amy Einhorn Books/Putnam
  • Publishing date: 09/02/2010
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-13: 9780399156199
  • ISBN: 0399156194

Synopsis

Amazon Exclusive: Kathryn Stockett Interviews Sarah Blake

Kathryn Stockett was born and raised in Jackson, Mississippi. After graduating from the University of Alabama with a degree in English and Creative Writing, she moved to New York City, where she worked in magazine publishing and marketing for nine years. The Help is her first novel.Kathryn Stockett Here she talks with novelist Sarah Blake about her experiences writing The Postmistress.

Kathryn Stockett: I should start by saying that I am honored to be on the same page with you—I loved The Postmistress. The book is so complex, it gives you so much to think about and discuss. My first question to you is, how did the book come about? What made you start writing it?

Sarah Blake: Thanks so much, Kathryn—and I'd like to lob those kind words right back at you; it's a tremendous thrill for me to be in conversation with the author of The Help.

The Postmistress began with a picture that sprang into my head one day, of a woman sorting the mail in the back of a post office, quietly slipping a letter into her pocket instead of delivering it. Immediately, questions flooded forward: Whose letter was it? Why on earth would she choose to pocket it? What havoc would be wreaked by not delivering a letter? As I answered those questions, Emma and Will and their love story, and the workings of the small town in which Iris was the center, came to life. One hundred pages into that draft, Frankie Bard arrived on the bus, out of the blue. I had no idea who she was or why she was there, except that one character referred to her as a war correspondent without a war. That was interesting, I thought. By this time I had decided to set the novel in the late thirties, early forties. It was 2001 and I was living in Washington, D.C., after the attacks of 9/11, and I was very preoccupied with trying to make sense of what was happening around me. Were we in danger? Would we go to war? The parallels between that uncertain time and the time before the United States entered World War II resonated with me, and what was a novel about accident and fate and the overlapping of lives deepened into a novel with war as its backdrop, which asked questions about how we understand ourselves to be in a historical moment and what we do when we are called to it.

Kathryn Stockett: Your book features three different women. From a logistical standpoint, did you find it hard to pull off the different points of view? I know this is something I spend a lot of time on in my work—making sure the voices are distinct and also very much true to the different characters.

Sarah BlakeSarah Blake: To be honest, with this novel, the challenge was trying to keep each of these women in line, since each one threatened at some point or another to run away with the story! It took eight years for this story to become the novel you have in your hands, and in large part that's because with the introduction of each character, I found myself going off and following an individual story, traveling further and further from a workable plot. By the time I had finished, I had written three separate novels, one for each of the three women—complete with love affairs, whole families, other towns—and the challenge came not in trying to keep them distinct, but in trying to figure out how to weave their stories together.

Kathryn Stockett: Who is your favorite character, and why?

Sarah Blake: I'm not sure I can answer that, since there are parts of each of these women I admire, and parts of each of them I don't like. They are all broken in an essential way—a way I find incredibly interesting. When a reporter finds she cannot tell a story and a postmaster finds herself unable to pass along a letter, the moments they have arrived at as characters are compelling. Mrs. Cripps was certainly the most fun to write—she didn’t have to carry too much weight in the telling of the story, and she was such a nosy parker it was fun to write her lines.

Kathryn Stockett: Is there a character in The Postmistress with whom you identify most? (And if you have been having trysts with good-looking soldiers in dark alleyways, please share!)

Sarah Blake: Oh, there are bits of me in all three women: certainly Frankie's rage and sorrow, the desire to get the story (something I despaired of often in the eight years of writing); Iris's love of order; and Emma's feeling of invisibility, her longing for the sense that someone would watch over her.

Kathryn Stockett: The most haunting scenes for me—and there were many—were those of Frankie on the train with Thomas and of the mother and child on the train platform. How did these scenes come about? Were they difficult to write?

Sarah Blake: Much of the drive to write the book had to do with my own attempt to write my way toward understanding the sudden, final breaks that crack into our lives, in the form of accidents, death, other irrevocable events. I have two sons, and while it is impossible for me to imagine putting them on a train by themselves, with nothing but paper to send them to safety, it was easy to conjure feelings of despair and heartbreak. The book is full of mothers and sons being torn apart by childbirth, bombs, and visas; but the last parting—the mother embracing her boy in the train car with Frankie—was probably the most difficult to write. It's the hardest to comprehend, and yet it happened all the time, saying good-bye, knowingly, possibly forever.

Kathryn Stockett: What research did you do for historical accuracy? You seem to have really nailed the time period.

Sarah Blake: Thank you. I'm glad it feels credible. I read many books on the history of World War II, pored through Life magazines from 1939 to 1945 for a sense of how much things cost and what they looked like, read Federal Writers Project interviews with all types of people living on Cape Cod in the 1930s, watched movies made in 1940 and 1941 (my favorite is The Letter with Bette Davis) in order to get the rhythms of idiomatic speech. I also spent many hours at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, and at the Radio & Television Museum in Bowie, Maryland.

(Photo of Kathryn Stockett © Kem Lee)



In just a few easy steps below, you can become an online reviewer.
You'll be able to make changes before you submit your review.

  • good but not the best of WWII fiction
    From Amazon

    i didn't really relate to emma, dr.fitch, or iris. i had my moments of relating to frankie. i found some of the story to be very compelling, particularly the part of the book where frankie is traveling through europe. i thought the start of the story with iris going to/from boston was almost unnecessary except that it introduces emma on the bus. compared to the book thief and the guernsey literary and potato peel pie society, this was a weaker novel for me.

  • FELL SHORT
    From Amazon

    This book was recommended by a friend I trust. I thought it had its moments, but just fell short. I must say I listened to the audio version, and did not like the reader. Her male voice was bad, and Iris' accent kept changing. The story left me wanting. The female journalist in Europe at the beginning of WW II, and references to real journalists like Edward Murrow added to the story. Hitler's brutality, and the horrors of war were stark and real. I could not identify with Emma, nor her doctor husband. The end, where all was meant to be resolved, tested my patience. Two steps forward, and one back. Way too much angst over messages. The real stretch for me was the unbelievable chance meeting in a London bomb shelter.

  • Interesting tale
    From Amazon

    I read this the same week I read "The Help" and "Wench" -- I liked both of those better than this one, though I'd still say this was interesting.

  • The Postmistress
    From Amazon

    I agree with the others who have given this book one star: the characters are flat and uninteresting, and many times their motivations are unclear. And I felt that the author didn't know where she was taking these characters. Consider the title of the book: "The Postmistress." It refers to Iris, but that character does not label herself a postmistress, but a postmaster. Perhaps the book's title was the publisher's doing, not the author's. Also, I didn't understand WHY it was important to Iris that she get a certificate from the out-of-town doctor saying she was still a virgin. And to begin a book telling your readers (at a fictional dinner party) that the premise of the book is to be about a postmistress who doesn't deliver letters, and have the dinner guests say "I'm hooked already!" when that premise is utterly boring, was a mistake, I thought. The character best thought out -- but who still remained two-dimensional -- was Frankie, gal correspondent. I hadn't heard of this author before, and perhaps her other book is better. This one was terrible, and I would NOT recommend it to any reader.

  • A Taste of Pre-WWII America
    From Amazon

    For me, this book was as much about war coverage of the period as it was about the characters that were living through it. When I think about WWII, I think about it from when the United States officially entered the war, although I know it started well before then. The whole premise of this story takes place before the US entered the war and I learned so much from this book about the American mind set of the time - we were safe, it was over there, it wouldn't happen to us. Sarah Blake does an incredible job of portraying the people of the small Cape Cod town of Franklin, Massachusetts. I loved hearing their discussions about what was going on "over there". Frankie Bard is over in the Blitz in London and later in France and Germany reporting back to those here in the US about the conditions in these places. She was the voice that brought this news back to the people and she tried to put emotion into the stories - so that people would actually feel what was happening. Even though I certainly wasn't around during WWII, I could connect some of the points of the novel to what has been happening today - we are safe, it is over there, it couldn't happen to us. It's amazing how the author can really drag your perceptions of today into the novel and you can connect to it. Three characters are the central focus of the story - Frankie Bard (the radio reporter), Iris James (the postmistress), and Emma Fitch (the doctor's wife). These three women are brought together by various events and consequences and really help each other survive. My favorite character by far was Emma Fitch. I think her hopes, fears, and desires were clear to the reader and consistent from start to finish - the most fleshed out character. I really had a hard time with the postmistress - who corrects people over and over that she is indeed a postmaster. I felt that she was a little all over the place. She starts out as this person who has always had all her ducks in a row and takes her job very seriously; when she withholds the letter, and her reasoning behind it, it felt very contrived and not within the character. For a book that is titled The Postmistress, I found Iris to not be the central focus or even the most important character. To comment on the audiobook - I think that this was a great choice to listen to. When so much of the story is made up of Frankie's radio broadcasts, you really felt like you were listening to it the way it was meant to be. It added a touch of reality and I think it put me into the mindset of the time period easier. See my post later this week for some real radio broadcasts from the war. Overall, I felt that this book brought home the feeling of ambivalence about the war in the US. The aspects of the book that were tied up the best were those that related to the war and what was happening. Some of the characters needed to be fleshed out a little more to be completely believable and that would have made the story much better. 3.5 stars.

Close
Working on your request